While Westerns aren’t usually
my favorite genre of movies, The Searchers was interesting and eventful enough that
it captured my attention. It contained the usual things that these sorts of
movies include: Indians, who are the bad guys of the movie, and Americans, who
are the good guys. There is stereotyping of the Indians through their clothing,
feathers, houses, faulty weapons, and horses. I don’t think that the Indian
characters were portrayed fairly; their characters had little depth and seem to
be incapable of outsmarting the white men. It is unfair that movies such as
this depict Native Americans as not being as smart as the Americans.
In addition, gender roles were prevalent in the movie as well. Women were seen as the ones who prepared meals and cleaned the house. When the Indians attacked the family in the house, they killed the parents and the son, but kidnapped the two girls. I’m not sure exactly why they were taken and not just killed, but it may have to do with the fact that they would be able to act as maids for the Indians, or they just didn’t want to kill young girls. The search parties were always made up of men; women were not allowed to join them. This shows that women were not seen as useful or able to do dangerous things. Gender roles in this movie are typical of what I would expect from a movie made in 1956, and also typical of the time period that was portrayed in the movie.
In addition, gender roles were prevalent in the movie as well. Women were seen as the ones who prepared meals and cleaned the house. When the Indians attacked the family in the house, they killed the parents and the son, but kidnapped the two girls. I’m not sure exactly why they were taken and not just killed, but it may have to do with the fact that they would be able to act as maids for the Indians, or they just didn’t want to kill young girls. The search parties were always made up of men; women were not allowed to join them. This shows that women were not seen as useful or able to do dangerous things. Gender roles in this movie are typical of what I would expect from a movie made in 1956, and also typical of the time period that was portrayed in the movie.
Something I didn’t understand
about the movie, though, was why Ethan wanted to shoot Debbie when they found
her with Chief Scar. They had spent all of those years looking for her and
hoping she was alive, and then he wanted to kill her. Was it just because she
had been living with the Indians for so long and called them “her people”?
Another confusing aspect of the movie was the way time passed. The filmmakers
did not do a very good job showing the viewer that years and years had gone by.
If I was not made aware of this fact, I would have been incredibly confused. Overall though, I thought this was a pretty good movie and was even somewhat entertaining.
Regarding gender roles; did you think that Laurie was conventional, or not?
ReplyDeleteThe answer to your question about Debbie was implied by Laurie, actually. They assume that she has been traded around to the Indian men and that she may have even had children with them.
I agree completely about the passage of time. It was extremely confusing. It first showed Lucy's boyfriend dying and then they switch to Ethan and Martin talking to his parents about the letter they sent a year earlier. Then it randomly jumped to about five years earlier. So that by the time they fouind Debbie, I didn't even realize it was her.
ReplyDelete